Three Things Clients Need From Their Lawyers

 I sometimes laugh at the notion of lawyers as counselors. We are not trained to be counselors.  We are trained in the law and by experience we learn to be fighters. Advocates. I have always liked the French term "avocat" as it better describes our role in the disputes that dominate our professional lives.  But what do our clients really need from us?  And what does the idea of "wise counsel" include?

First - clients need and deserve our full attention. They need to unload the facts and circumstances that make their case, and they need to know that we understand their plight.  Let's call this ACKNOWLEDGMENT.  They need to know that we understand all the facts so that we can help them tell their story. Every case is just that - a story.  Our clients are not bit players in their dramas, they are the stars.  So we need to acknowledge their role and give them our best attention.

Second - our clients need the TRUTH about their situation.  We have the benefit of our education and experience. The key to making their position a winner is understanding how their facts fit the law. Once we know how facts and law will join, we need to tell them what we think about their position.  Is there position likely to carry the day? If not, they need to hear that from us, before a judge or jury tells them what we so often know but do not fully articulate.  The truth can save them money and save us the emotional upheaval every trial brings. 

Third - our clients need the benefit of our ability to lead in the face of the storm - this is VISION. Vision encompasses more than just acknowledgement and truth. Vision transcends the tough times and sleepless nights our clients cannot get past.  Vision is our ability to keep moving forward regardless of the collateral damage. But in tough times, vision is the first casualty.  Think of a time in your life where you faced that seemingly impossible situation. Was your ability to see the bigger picture eclipsed by the detail of your personal hardship? Our clients and their families are under incredible stress, handling life and death decisions that grip them. They are often depressed, indecisive, preoccupied and mired down with anxiety and guilt.  They need us to lead and to direct - they need the vision that comes from our view of the territory and understanding of the law.

If you are a lawyer thinking about next year - as I am right now - maybe these thoughts will help with your planning.  My resolution for 2010 is to be a more client-focussed "avocat.."  

I will try to not fight with the folks who have asked me to fight for them.  This is not always easy because of their emotional state and the stakes involved in their case, and sometimes, the client is wrong.  Sometimes the client won't listen and will not take our advice.  But I will try.

Have some thoughts for the coming year?  Share them - and let's do it better in 2010.

Idaho Middle School Teacher Goes To Prison For Sex With Student

 Kari Atkinson, a 28-year-old former middle school teacher will spend at least two years in prison for having sex with her 14-year-old student.  To protect the boy, the court also ordered that she not have any contact with him for eighteen years.  The sentence includes two years fixed time - that is time that must be served before Atkinson is eligible for parole - and sixteen indeterminate years.  The indeterminate time runs after the fixed time.  

This case illustrates the Idaho sentencing scheme.  A person sentenced to the Idaho Board of Corrections may be eligible for parole, but never be released.  Release depends on performance in prison.  If Ms. Atkinson is released, her life will be "managed" by a Parole officer assigned to her case.  

We often hear that women and men receive different treatment from the courts when it comes to sex crimes.  Perhaps that is true, perhaps not.  Still, the system takes a very dim view of sex with minors and will continue to punish those who violate the law.  The two years of "fixed" time may not seem like much, but even a few days in jail serves to remind most folks of the value of their liberty.  And if Ms. Atkinson thinks that prison is tough - on release she will still have to face a parole officer who may keep her away from minors and family members, and who will decide where she can live, what she can do and how she can do it.  Parole is not freedom.  Sometimes it can be an opportunity to really change your life, but often it is not.

The high cost of a criminal conviction includes the loss of freedom over your life and the limitation on your liberty.  It also includes the lost opportunities for careers and relationships.  

Have a story to share about lost liberty?  Post it here and let's start a discussion.

Tags:

When Troubles Come - They Come In Battalions

 This week I am in trial preparation mode and only this morning checked my email for the past five days.  In my email I found a post  to a blog written by Trial Lawyers College great, Paul Luvera. Luvera is a master of the game and a wonderful teacher.  If you are a lawyer reading this, go to his blog and learn from his years of experience.  Today's message from Paul - entitled Random Thoughts - begins with a quote from Shakespeare's Hamlet:

"When sorrows come - they come not single spies - but in battalions."

He goes on to point out that "nothing ever goes the way it is planned or expected when it comes to trial work."  Like those sorrows, our cases tend to unravel first by a thread and then by the entire cloth. We need to keep focussed on our end game.  We need to keep working toward resolution of the case, preparing to win while recognizing that something will come undone - and then something else.  When that happens we look at ourselves and question whether we have done enough for the case and for the client. That's where those sleepless nights come in - over and over again.

In a recent case I had that eleventh hour complication every lawyer fears.  Some little fact the client had left "unsaid" until the night before she was to testify.  That "little gem" would have given the prosecutor the door to run a train through our case, so we decided to not call our client to the stand. That created additional problems because in opening I had told the jury they would hear certain testimony which seemingly could only come from my client.  Not a single problem, a battalion of problems created because I did not have the "whole" story.  The client had not trusted me with the entire truth.

So how does a criminal defense lawyer, or any other trial lawyer handle this type of problem during trial of the case?  You've gotta' be quick on your feet.  And even then, you may not recover.  It is better to know all the case before, than get to trial and discover that one fact that betrays you.  

Off to meet with a client.  Luvera has inspired me to talk in ernest with him about that one little spy in the case.  Seems almost certain to me that there is a battalion out there waiting to attack my flank if I am not fully fortified in my defense, and experienced trial lawyers know that preparation is the only fortification we have.  F. Lee used to say "the defense is never ready, enough."

If you are a lawyer with a "spy" problem - send in a comment and start a discussion here.  How do we best prepare for the coming battalion?

If you are have a legal problem, do the same. If I can't help, perhaps I can put you in touch with someone who can.

Tags: